Are Modern Flip Phones Worth It? Flip7 vs Razr Ultra
Flip phones spent years asking buyers to accept a smaller, weaker phone in exchange for a fun shape to unfold. That compromise mostly doesn't exist anymore. Are modern flip phones worth it in 2026? Based on the two current U.S. flagships, Samsung's Galaxy Z Flip7 and Motorola's Razr Ultra 2026, the answer is yes for a specific kind of buyer, and no for another.
The Flip7 has been on sale since July 25, 2025, starting at $1,099.99 for 256GB (Samsung Newsroom, last year). The Razr Ultra 2026 went on sale May 21, 2026, priced at $1,500 for its single 512GB/16GB configuration, $200 more than the previous Razr Ultra (Android Central, earlier this year). Both phones carry only an IP48 rating, which The Verge notes guarantees protection against solid particles no smaller than 1mm, meaning finer dust or sand could still work its way inside (The Verge, last year).
This isn't a review of one phone over the other. It's an argument that the flip format itself, the cover screen, the folded footprint, the rear camera doubling as a selfie camera, has matured into something worth real consideration next to a standard slab phone. Where the Flip7 and Razr Ultra 2026 diverge on battery, charging, and camera hardware, that's a model decision, not proof the category solved its old weaknesses across the board.
Reasons to buy a modern flip phone instead of a regular smartphone
The clearest gain in this format is that closed-phone use has gone from a gimmick to something close to a substitute for unlocking a full phone. The Verge traces the shift to the 2023 Motorola Razr Plus, whose 3.6-inch outer display, the largest on a flip phone at the time, let people reply to texts, browse Spotify, and run full apps without opening the phone (The Verge, last year).
Both current flagships build on that. The Flip7's cover display is a 4.1-inch edge-to-edge panel running at up to 120Hz, and Samsung has added Gemini Live directly to it, so voice search and task completion work without unfolding the phone (Samsung Newsroom, last year). The Razr Ultra 2026's cover screen is 4 inches; its widely cited 165Hz refresh rate belongs to the phone's 7-inch inner display, not the cover panel, so that spec shouldn't be compared across the two screens (Android Central, earlier this year). Motorola also built a Daily Drop feature into its software, a single feed of calendar events, weather, news, and photo memories, similar to Samsung's Now Brief (Android Central, earlier this year).
None of this replaces the main screen. Streaming, gaming, and reading still require unfolding either phone. The benefit is narrow but real: anyone who checks a phone often but briefly gets a genuine shortcut; anyone whose habits are mostly full-screen tasks won't notice the difference.
A smaller footprint, with an honest thickness trade-off
Folded, the Flip7 measures 85.5 x 75.2 x 13.7mm and weighs 188 grams, which Samsung calls its slimmest Flip yet (Samsung Newsroom, last year). The Razr Ultra 2026 folds down to 88.1 x 74 x 15.7mm and weighs 199 grams, about 2mm thicker than the Flip7 when closed (Android Central, earlier this year). Unfolded, the Flip7 opens to a 6.9-inch display and the Razr Ultra 2026 to a 7-inch display, so both are carrying a full-size flagship screen inside a folded shape small enough to slip into a pocket (Android Central, earlier this year).
That's the actual trade: less height and width in a pocket or bag, plus a screen that folds face-in and stays protected, in exchange for more thickness than a slab phone with an equivalent display. Buyers chasing the thinnest possible phone in hand should know a flip is thinner unfolded and thicker folded, not simply "smaller" across every dimension.
The rear camera doubles as a sharper selfie camera
Because the cover display can act as a viewfinder, both phones let people shoot selfies with their main rear cameras instead of a dedicated front sensor. Samsung markets Flip7 selfies shot through the FlexWindow, using its 50MP main and 12MP ultrawide rear cameras, as "flagship-level clarity," which is a company claim rather than an independently verified result (Samsung Newsroom, last year). The Razr Ultra 2026 pairs a 50MP LOFIC main sensor built for dynamic range with a 50MP ultrawide, both usable through the cover screen the same way (Android Central, earlier this year).
Megapixel counts alone don't prove better selfies than a dedicated front camera would produce; framing flexibility and lighting from a larger sensor matter more than the number on a spec sheet. ZDNET's hands-on test pitted the previous-generation Razr Ultra against the Flip7 and found the Razr's camera, display, and charging speed came out ahead, useful directional evidence, but that comparison used last year's Razr Ultra, not the 2026 model, so it doesn't confirm results for the phone currently on sale (ZDNET, last year).
This feature matters most to people who take frequent selfies or social content and want more resolution and lighting flexibility than a typical front camera offers. It's a wash for anyone who rarely uses a front-facing camera at all.
Where the Flip7 and Razr Ultra 2026 actually differ
Battery size, charging speed, and camera hardware differences between these two phones aren't evidence that flip phones as a category fixed their old weaknesses. They're evidence that one specific model currently has stronger specs on paper.
The Razr Ultra 2026 packs a 5,000mAh battery with 68W wired and 30W wireless charging, which Android Central describes as the largest battery it has seen on a flip-style foldable and closer to a conventional flagship than any prior clamshell (Android Central, earlier this year). The Flip7 uses a smaller 4,300mAh cell with 25W wired charging, which Samsung calls its largest battery in the Flip line, though it trails the Razr Ultra's numbers on paper (Samsung Newsroom, last year; Android Central, earlier this year). The supplied research doesn't include independent, model-specific battery or camera testing of the 2026 Razr Ultra, so "strongest hardware on paper" is the accurate claim here, not "best battery life," which stays unproven until reviewers put both 2026 phones through the same mixed-use testing.
Software support is the other divide. Samsung has committed to up to seven major Android updates for the Flip7, and Android Central's coverage of the Razr Ultra 2026 doesn't mention an equivalent multi-year commitment from Motorola (Android Central, earlier this year). That absence doesn't confirm Motorola won't match it, only that current coverage doesn't establish a comparable pledge, which matters at this price.
Two trade-offs that aren't the same problem
Dust exposure and screen-protector damage get lumped together as one vague "durability concern," but they're separate risks with separate causes.
IP48 certifies these phones against solid particles no smaller than 1mm; anything finer, like fine dust, sand, or workshop debris, can still work its way inside and cause damage (The Verge, last year). That's a rating limitation, not a defect, but it means "dust resistant" oversells what IP48 actually promises.
Separately, The Verge reported that multiple reviewers of foldables broadly, including CNBC's review unit, experienced inner-screen failures after peeling off the factory-installed screen protector, which was designed to stay permanently adhered rather than be removed (The Verge, last year). That's a reported pattern across the foldable category generally, not a confirmed defect rate for the current Flip7 or Razr Ultra 2026 specifically, but it's a habit worth breaking before it becomes an expensive mistake.
Both risks sit on top of flagship-or-higher pricing, from $1,099.99 to $1,500 at launch, and a hinge and multi-layer screen add a moving part a slab flagship simply doesn't carry (Samsung Newsroom, last year; Android Central, earlier this year). The Verge put it bluntly when weighing whether to recommend the category at all, noting how hard it is to tell the average buyer to spend $1,000 on a flip phone given that unresolved dust question. Treat these as two separate checklist items: never peel the factory screen protector, and don't assume IP48 covers everyday sand or fine dust.
Flip7, Razr Ultra 2026, or neither
- Choose the Flip7 if price, a thinner folded carry, and confirmed long-term software support matter most. It starts $400 lower than the Razr Ultra, offers a 256GB entry option the Razr Ultra doesn't, and comes with Samsung's seven-update commitment (Samsung Newsroom, last year; Android Central, earlier this year). Its cover screen is also marginally larger, 4.1 inches against the Razr Ultra's 4 inches, a small edge on the exact usability case this piece is built on.
- Choose the Razr Ultra 2026 only if the on-paper battery, charging, and camera specs are worth $400 more and 11 extra grams. Confirm Motorola's current repair-network coverage and software-update policy directly before buying, since current coverage doesn't show a pledge matching Samsung's (Android Central, earlier this year).
- Choose neither, and buy a conventional slab flagship instead, if a possible dust- or screen-protector-related repair isn't something you can tolerate, or if the $1,099.99-to-$1,500 price range cited above doesn't leave room for a phone with an unresolved category-wide dust question.
- Before counting on insurance as a backstop, check current terms directly. Samsung's launch materials advertise unlimited same-day screen and back-glass repairs under Care+ with Theft and Loss, but that announcement doesn't confirm today's pricing, deductibles, or whether dust- or hinge-related failures are excluded (Samsung Newsroom, last year). Verify on Samsung's current plan page before assuming it covers the risks above.
The format itself has earned a real look: a cover screen that replaces routine unlocks, a folded shape that's genuinely easier to pocket, and a selfie setup that borrows the better rear cameras. Buy the Flip7 for the lower entry price and the confirmed update runway. Consider the Razr Ultra 2026 only after checking its current support and repair terms directly and deciding the hardware premium is worth $400. If dust exposure or repair uncertainty are dealbreakers, a slab flagship is still the safer buy until independent, model-specific durability testing exists for both 2026 phones.
Comments
Be the first, drop a comment!